About Me

Name: Brian A. Iannucci
Email: brian@brianiannucci.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Simple Solutions to Healthcare

The issue of healthcare is one that has been a hot button in recent days. I would like to address this issue on more of a micro-level. Coming from a pharmaceutical background I am all too aware of the downfalls and funding issues that come with State Medicaid. These unfunded mandates from the federal government are a drain of the coffers of Florida and other states.
 
This, coupled with the trying times that we are facing due to the economy and the increase in cost of care, has brought a perfect storm of problems that plague this issue. However, the idea that the increased number of insured individuals can be mitigated with just efficiency is asinine. The federal government seems to see the fix to this problem as creating bureaucracies that will increase the speed at which care is provided and lower the cost of said care. This is simply incorrect and will add more levels to the problem thereby increasing wait times, lowering quality of care, and rationing the available care. This is evidenced in the Indian Healthcare system that is administered by the Federal Government.
 
States can help to alleviate some of its problems by making some changes in the way we address the care of Medicaid patients. This starts with tort reform that creates a more favorable climate for physicians to practice medicine. By removing some of the burden of legal liability and frivolous lawsuits we can thereby lower liability insurance premiums for doctors. This step alone will create a decrease in the cost of care for all patients, regardless of whether they are insured by Medicaid, privately insured, or uninsured.
 
Next, the state can look to the free market for solutions regarding care by increasing awareness of the cost of healthcare. Currently, many  individuals believe that the cost of their healthcare is measured in co-payments made under a managed care plan they are enrolled in. This distracts those individuals from understanding the true cost of the care they are being provided. If the system we closer to a "fee for service" system, not unlike purchasing groceries or other goods, People would become more aware of the costs that are created in the system thus creating a more natural competitive environment for the distribution of healthcare.
 
Finally, the idea of heath insurance is absurd. The idea that a company should pay for routine care and other planned medical expenses defeats the purpose of the idea of insurance. Insurance should be looked at as a plan that covers the unexpected major problems that are encountered. Similar to auto insurance, there is no need to cover the routine care of individuals. When has an auto insurer ever covered oil changes, tires, or windshield wipers? They don't because it is not financially feasible. Therefore, the cumbersome requirements that are imposed by the state for insurance companies to cover numerous conditions increase the cost of insurance and remove the freedom of individuals to pick and choose what they want covered in a plan. There is no reason that I should be forced to have an insurance plan that covers alcohol or drug rehabilitation. I should be able to choose what I want covered and be able to opt out of coverages that are not necessary.
 
Just addressing these few issues will allow for the states to be a trendsetter in the way healthcare is delivered and managed.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Third Party Talk v. Join or Die

Hello Everyone,
 
   As has been discussed over the past few months the perceived need for a third party in the United States has percolated to a point where it must be addressed. As Republicans we have seen great success in fighting the Obama-Pelosi-Reid Agenda through the Congress. Additionally,the conservative base of the party has made significant headway in bringing the GOP back to its roots. Accolades must be extended on both sides. The lessons learned by those who have begun to cater to the middle of the political spectrum are evident and must be heeded. As a party we are realizing the negative impacts of identity politics and the flaws in changing our message to suit the political moderates.
 
   At the time of our founding our nation took on a "Join or Die" mentality. Founders such as Adams, Jefferson, Paine, Henry, and Hancock understood that colonies who had similar interests yet were divided in certain areas of their beliefs had a fragile footing on which to base their new nation. Yet for the betterment of the nation the thirteen colonies found it in their best interest to form an alliance against British Sovereignty.
 
   Ronald Reagan believed that a firm conservative base was necessary and should be unyielding with regards to its principles. Reagan also was seen as a consensus builder who brought the many sides of the debate together. How can these two diametrically differing points be reconciled? Simply put, Reagan had a nack for bringing those into the conservative movement based on their beliefs in conservative principles. With a firm understanding of the need to build a coalition Reagan sought the support of those whom he agreed with, asked them to put aside their differences, and join for the common good of the nation. This is what I ask today.
 
   As many of us understand, there are several competing viewpoints in our party right now. However, the overarching goal of our movement is to quash the liberal agenda. With this being the goal we must put aside our differences and unite under the Republican banner for the good of our nation.
 
   A recent Rasmussen Poll shows that in the state of Florida that the generic Congressional ballot shows a seven point lead for the GOP. However, when you factor in a third party, the so-called "Tea Party" the split among the conservative vote is evident giving the Democrats 36% of the vote with the Tea Party receiving 23% and the GOP garnering 18%. This split would guarantee a myriad of liberals getting elected and would doom our state to a generation of liberal policies (http://cbs4.com/national/crist.rubio.senate.2.1373219.html).
 
   It is for these reasons that the push for a third party is obtuse and short sighted when it comes to the end goal of defeating the liberal agenda. While we certainly do not see eye-to-eye on certain points I am certain that we all can agree that the alternative of liberal political domination is an end that we can ill afford.
 
   I call upon all of us to take a stand against the flawed approach of third party politics. I understand the frustration that is caused by feeling less than valued by your party. I too have had frustrating moments over the years and can relate to the reactionary desire for a new party. Regardless of the problems we have, they pale in comparision to the strife that would be caused by unchecked liberalism. Please take heed of the warning that Rasmussen gives us for without cooler heads prevailing we are certainly doomed to experience high taxes, imposing government regulations, single payer healthcare, and the decline of the United States as the global hegemon. All of these consequences are unacceptable.
 
JOIN OR DIE!!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Reflections on 9/11

 

                As I began my day this morning I was struck with the melancholy mood that is being purveyed throughout the new media. Much as I do during my everyday routine I went about the tasks needed to be accomplished. As the levity of the day began to hit me I heard the call for a moment of silence over the airwaves. I reflected back on this day eight years earlier.

As a younger, brasher individual I remember listening to the radio that morning and in an eerily similar moment I flashed back to the moment I heard the news. I looked at the sky and noticed that, much like 9/11/2001, the deep blue of a late summer day was glaring through my window. The stories flooded back to my memory, from Todd Beamer to the countless firefighters and policemen, and finally, to the families. So many families had loved ones taken away. So many husbands and wives had to face a reality of going home to an empty bed in a quiet house. So many children had to hear the news that Mommy or Daddy was not coming home. So many parents, friends, neighbors, and co-workers had to deal with the strife of knowing the gravity of the situation and the reality of the day’s events were such that there would be major changes.

Now here we are, eight years later, still grappling with this same reality. How? Why? Will it happen again? These are just a few of the questions that our society faces on a regular basis. As a member of “Generation X” the reality is somewhat different. We always reflect back on the formative experiences of our lifetime. For those of the “Greatest Generation” it was World War II. For the “Baby Boomers” it was the 1960’s and Vietnam. However, the reality that I measure my life with is certainly 9/11. It has changed the way I look at things, changed my goals, and certainly helped to shape my politics.

Now that eight years have passed I have an opportunity to view the entire tragedy from a slightly different perspective. Unlike in 2001 I am married, have two wonderful children, and own a small business. The reality of 9/11 has certainly shaped who I am today but is also gives me pause to remember. I look back on a 32 year old Todd Beamer who, without training and warning, gave the ultimate sacrifice on that plane in Shanksville, PA. With two small children, one on the way, a wife, a career, and a great deal of life ahead of him I try to put myself in his shoes and pray that I would be half the man he proved himself to be.

Nevertheless, there are those in our nation that are still living with a pre-9/11 mindset. President Obama sees this as a national day of service. He couldn’t be farther from the truth. This day can only be a day to remember the sacrifices of those lost, the resolve of our nation in the weeks after, the vigilance of our everyday life, the pain of the entire tragedy, and the anger we all felt. Without these observances we are doomed to vulnerability.

Pelosi, Reed, Holder, and many of their colleagues are now trying to prosecute the very men and women in our intelligence communities that have protected us from another attack. Without regard for the safety of our nation these individuals seek to breach the blanket of security provided for our citizens by condemning the actions of those that wove that very cloth. Further, they seek to protect the individuals that we hold in Guantanamo Bay. These individuals pose a threat to our nation and, if given the chance, will seek to do further harm to innocent men and women here and abroad.

Finally, there are those in our society that continue to weaken our nation by trying to make the United States accountable to international organizations such as the United Nations, World Courts, and other NGO’s that are a clear threat to our way of life. This coupled with legislation such as Cap and Trade, which will handicap our national economy, and National Single Payer Healthcare, which will destroy the best healthcare system in the world, will continue to bring our nation down. We are the lone world superpower for a reason and this supremacy is a responsibility that we must take on. Truly, the idea of national exceptionalism is lost on those that seek to harm our nation.

Please take this day to remember the greatness of our nation and the need for fair, responsible government. DO NOT LOOSE SIGHT OF THE SAFETY AND GREATNESS OF THE UNITED STATES. Remember our forefathers came to this land and established the greatest governmental experiment and we all reap the rewards of this sage wisdom. A government for the people and by the people is subservient to the very people that control it. Bear in mind the need for individual liberties and personal responsibility when you think about the sacrifices of those that came before, those that currently serve our country both overseas and domestically, and the citizens of this great land that make it work simply by efforting in anonymity on a daily basis.

May God bless this nation of ours and may He protect and keep us all!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What If?

What If?
 
What if we were to never recognize a war declared on the United States by a group of individuals that seek to destroy the very freedoms that we hold dear?
 
What if the suicide attacks that we have seen in Israel for the last twenty plus years were perpetrated on the streets of your town?
 
What if the economic consequences of another domestic terrorist arrack were to be realized on a regular basis bringing about a real depression?
 
What if, in the rush to make nice with our enemies, our actions were misconstrued as a sign of weakness?
 
What if Islamo-Fascists were allowed to infiltrate our borders, emboldened by the retreat of American Troops from a war and a theater that has seen total domination and real success?
 
What if those in political power continue to decide that spending/wasting trillions of dollars is more important than concentrating on finishing the mission in the War on Terror?
 
What if we allow more money to be spent by our government to save an endangered rat/mouse in San Francisco than will be spent to create a safer world?
 
What if the Congress actually allowed the American people to review the "Porkulus" Bill, as they promised, as opposed to ramming it through so that Nancy Pelosi can go on her trip to Europe?
 
What if the Republican Party continued to stand up for conservative values instead of always playing nice with the Democrats?
 
What if the Republicans were to remove Sen. Specter, Sen. Collins, and Sen. Snowe from the Republican Caucus?
 
What if a group of people that support a man that received only 19,285 votes nationally (less than Nader, Keyes, Baldwin, Barr, and McKinney) learned that they should stop being a fly in the ointment?
 
What if we were to actually have elected a conservative to the White House and avoided the Stimulus Bill completely?
 
What if the mainstream media were to end their infatuation with Pres. Obama?
 
What if people stopped looking for a handout and took personal responsibility for their actions or inactions?
 
What if our nation is in danger from our "Blame American First" mentality?
 
What if the same attention was paid to the nominees to Obama's Cabinet and their tax problems as has been paid in the past to trumped up charges against people like Trent Lott?
 
What if people were to realize that the drop in the bucket that is spent in the War on Terror is far less than the economic and infrastructure impact of another terrorist attack?
 
What if the Democratic push for the expansion of government did not have the direct consequence of putting our children and grandchildren in debt?
 
Finally, what if the United States could speak with one voice so that our enemies would understand, in no uncertain terms, that there are consequences for the bombings of the Khobar Towers, the USS Cole, 9/11, and the continued attacks on our troops?
 
 
 
Brian A. Iannucci
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why the Republican Liberty Caucus (RLC) is not Republican

 

Over the past few months there has been an increased amount of "noise" made by a group calling itself "The Republican Liberty Caucus." It seems that this group has grown tired of being members of the Libertarian Party so they are trying to take over the Republican Party. Using the Ron Paul candidacy this group is trying to leverage Paul’s measly three percent of the vote into a national voice. This well organized and well funded group of reactionary individuals has made it their goal to bring their fringe belief to the forefront and try to become the mainstream of the Republican Party.

Their strategy is simple; to take over from within. By starting at the precinct level, the RLC is trying to elect their people to precinct chairmanships. This leads to a takeover of the county chairmanships. Next, the RLC wants to change the state representatives and chairmanships and then take over the national party leadership. This ruthless tactic is occurring throughout the nation. Everyone should be aware that it is happening and should take note.

Since the debate should be about ideas here are the facts behind the differences between the RLC and real Republicans.

The first argument that the RLC will use is that the only difference between their beliefs and the GOP is that they feel that the war should end and we should withdraw our troops. Their foreign policy platform is more like the liberals in this nation and is nothing like the GOP stance on the issue. However, the idea that the foreign policy debate is the only part of this groups' beliefs that is not in line with the GOP is false. The Republican Liberty Caucus, per their website, has several issues that are not in line with the GOP platform.

First and foremost is the RLC’s  isolationist position with regards to our national security. It is naive to believe that a pull back in the War on Terror will appease the Islamic Fascists. Our enemy in this war has been fighting the United States and western beliefs longer than the RLC is willing to acknowledge. From the bombings of US Embassies, the Khobar Towers, the Beirut barracks, the USS Cole, and many other offensive movements against our nation, not to mention 9/11, Islamic Fascists have made it clear they detest western ideals and they will continue to pursue offensive activities that will be a detriment to our nation. By burying our heads in the sand our nation will invite further attacks domestically. Such attacks will lead to a further constricting of liberty in this nation due to the fear of suicide bombings in this county. The more there is a terrorist threat in this nation the tighter the security will become at our airports, buildings, and schools. To pull out right now would embolden our enemies and show weakness.

Second, the RLC takes the Libertarian position on the legalization of drugs. This will bring about further social problems in this country by expanding addiction, easing access to illicit drugs, and allowing for the further deteriorization of the social fabric of this nation by endorsing use and abuse of drugs.

Finally, the lack of a litmus test for judicial nominees is a thinly veiled illusion to the current conflict over abortion and Roe v. Wade. Without vetting nominees to the bench we allow for the continued promotion of judicial activism which has brought about poor judicial decisions such as Roe v. Wade and the legalization of abortion, gay marriage in California and Massachusetts, and is a direct threat to second amendment rights.

These fundamental differences are in direct conflict with the current Republican platform. As I have discussed before, there are three legs to "The Republican Stool." Security, Social, and Economic Republican stances are necessary to be considered a member of our party. The RLC, and by extension, its members, are only Economic conservatives and are missing many of the core principles that our party requires. To have representatives of our party that are not in line with our platform would be detrimental to our future as a party. The beliefs that the RLC espouses are more in line with the Libertarian Party and those that are in line with these beliefs should consider membership in that organization as opposed to trying to bastardize the Republican Party.

The only course of action is to bring out these issues to the entire GOP at large and then to the media and those who will bring attention to it. These facts are crucial to the decision making process for the voters and should be the cornerstone of any campaign against the RLC movement. Letters to Editors, public meetings and debates, and an e-mail campaign are essential to the defeat of the RLC.

Don’t let this be the last time that the issue of the RLC is brought up. The critical time for action is now. The GOP must work to remove imposters from their ranks and remember that the GOP stands for true conservative values and not this half-hearted attempt at change. The RLC should not be allowed to run roughshod over the GOP. The time for being nice is over.

Let’s take out the trash.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hillary, The Best GOP Candidate

 

Once again we find the ambition of Hillary Clinton to be a main factor in the success of the GOP. Throughout the pre-primary season the mainstream media was enthralled with the idea of Hillary Clinton’s easy victory in not only the Democrat Primary but the general election. As the “candidate of inevitability” Hillary strode through the early primaries with the expectation of victory but the poise and control that would better describe a high school class presidential candidate as opposed to a candidate for President of the United States.

Yet through it all Clinton and her team showed no ability to close the deal and left the door open for a political sophomore in Obama. Sen. Obama is no more ready to preside over this nation than his hometown Chicago Cubs are ready to break their nearly-hundred year World Series drought. Both may look good from the outside but there are major flaws and a great deal working against them.

Clinton’s ego led her to believe that her victory would be secured after Super Tuesday and, therefore, she did not properly plan for a fifty state strategy. This ultimately led to her downfall in the race for delegates. However, the drive that she has displayed throughout her quest for national office will not let her fade into the night. It is this passion that will turn it around for the Republicans.

Republicans were facing major losses in the House, Senate, and a tough fight for the White House but Clinton has made it a bit closer. By staying in the race as long as she has she has aided in exposing the soft underbelly of Sen. Obama; a task that, by all accounts, would not even have been attempted b y the McCain campaign. Further, she has forced Obama in to a number of errors in judgment, made him define his policy positions much earlier than he would have liked, and brought characters into the fray such as Rev. Wright, Bill Ayres, and Rev. Pflager; all Achilles’ Heels for Obama. All of this while McCain has been able to leisurely stay above the fray and reintroduce himself to the American people.

Now that the primary season is completed Hillary is still reluctant to end her bid for the Democrat nomination. By dividing the Democrat constituencies of blacks and women, Clinton has also endangered her party’s prospect for picking up seats in the House and Senate and has all but closed the door on their presidential aspirations. Everyday she stays in, Clinton adds to the problem by diminishing the time that the Democrats have to reconcile and essentially “kiss and make up.”

The pipe dream of an Obama-Clinton dream ticket is the only saving grace that the Democrats have in sight. But with Bill and Hillary in the number two spot Obama would feel like Julius Caesar hanging out with Brutus and Cassius. It is simply not a smart, or safe, place to be. When the time is right you can count on the Clintons to do what is in their best interest. My advice to Obama would be to avoid Fort Marcy Park.

For his part, McCain has been a fool for giving his opponent a pass and boldly declaring that he would not be using attack ads to differentiate himself from Obama. Unfortunately, McCain has proven himself to be more concerned about decorum as opposed to victory. Thank goodness for talk radio and others that have made it a point to introduce us to the ilk that is associated with Obama. Foolish campaigning on McCain’s part will lead to allowing Obama to define the issues of the campaign and remain on the offensive for the better part of the allotted time. This will create a better image for Obama and allow him to excel with his oratory abilities and youthful charm.

As it stands now Hillary has been relegated to her Senate seat or possibly an appointed position in an unlikely Obama Administration (as scary as it is she may be angling for a Supreme Court appointment). Her participation has gone from the candidate of inevitability to a fly in the Democrat ointment. Howard Dean would love to broker a deal to get her out of the way but there are few signs that her candidacy will end before the Denver convention. All of this is good news for the GOP and spells doom for not only Obama but all the down ticket Democrats in the fall.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ron Paul and the Paul-istas are Trying to Ruin the GOP

 

Ron Paul? A Republican? Seriously?

Certainly this must be a mistake. How is it that an avowed member of the Libertarian Party seek the nomination of the GOP and get away with it? Simply put, this is just another example of the Republican Party’s lack of leadership. The constant barrage of attacks from the “Paul-istas” demonstrates the need for a firm and resolved direction for our party.

The idea that a faction of disillusioned Democrats, Independents, and Libertarians can push a candidate like Ron Paul for the Republican nomination for president is certainly a problem. However, without the votes to sustain a campaign and the paltry minority that the Paul-istas have brought to the polls there is a new problem that is emerging. The problem is that we now have to deal with this cadre of Paul-istas trying to transform our party into a shell of its former self.

Through e-mails, protests, annoyances, and vilifying the leadership of the local counties, the Paul-istas are seeking to be a vocal minority that allows for the destruction of the Republican Party. With national vote totals barely at 6% and a pathetic 19 delegates Ron Paul’s supporters are trying to sway the national opinion of the GOP by being the fly in the ointment. Further, they are trying to take over grassroots positions at the local level to further their cause.

Much like Rush Limbaugh’s Operation Chaos, the Paul-istas are attacking the GOP and trying to affect the outcome of the convention. While the national media’s eye is focused on the Democratic Primary the truth of the matter is that there is no cooptation of the Democrat Party structure such as is being attempted by the Paul-istas against the GOP. Further, if a group of individuals, obviously not Democrats, tried to affect these sort of changes that the Paul-istas are trying, the media and Democrat Party backlash would be so great that it would quash the entire plan.

As conservatives we must stand up to this stupidity. Go to you local Republican Party meetings and observe for yourself the stupidity that a small faction of fools can make. As conservatives we are loosing our party to the middle and just becoming a party that is more “Democrat Light” than Reagan-esque.

Forget big tent for a minute. We must fight for what we know to be principally right and not allow for the inclusion of ideas that are detrimental to our cause. Lower taxes, border security, reduced pork barrel spending, and victory in the War of Terrorism are the basic premises we must espouse. If we think for a minute that there are not enemies among us then we are sorely mistaken.

I would rather have a party that is morally right and stands on conservative principles then be subject to compromise. This is the only way to push the right agenda for America. We must stand for our principles and fight for what we know to be right.

Finally, a heart-felt thank you is in order for the members of the armed service pas and present and their families. On this Memorial Day we remember your sacrifices and acknowledge the fact that our nation would not be where it is today without your efforts.

God Bless you all!!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Spitzer and the Hypocritical Left Ride Again!!!

 

As the resident expert on political correctness (Google “The P.C. Fraud by Brian Iannucci”) I always find it quite funny when the P.C. Crowd looses one of its own to a senseless and pointless mistake that could have been avoided. The double standard that exists with political correctness and the liberal left is always good for a laugh. So here we go again. The Eliot Spitzer Incident that surfaced today is the next battlefront in the P.C. War. The way this entire story will play out will be carefully choreographed by the P.C. Crowd. From the media control to the resolution of the incident Spitzer will be in the hands of the P.C. Machine. This P.C. Machine will put the best face on the situation.

            As a liberal Spitzer will be protected and turned into a sympathetic figure; a victim if you will. This is opposite of the treatment that a conservative would get. Spitzer will get treated with white gloves. This is completely opposite of the treatment a conservative would get in a similar situation. Here lies the true double standard.

Rule Number One of the P.C. Crowd: "Say one thing and do another."

Rule Number Two of the P.C. Crowd: “Save the P.C.er at all costs.”

These rules are the hallmarks of the P.C. Crowd that I discuss in the book, The P.C. Fraud: Political Correctness in American Politics. However, liberals somehow seem to be able to get away with this. Time after time the left has vilified the Republicans based on their politically correct notions of what it right. By acting offended and making speeches that are full of bravado and hype the left is able to set the agenda. These speeches are designed to enflame the P.C. base and create problems for the poor conservative in the crosshairs.

Trent Lott is a prime example of the treatment that a conservative would get. For merely recognizing the achievements of Strom Thurmond he was portrayed as a racist and forced to resign his leadership post. Worst of all no one on the conservative side had the "testicular fortitude" to stand up for him. As a result, a good man and a great leader was sent packing to rebuild his career. Fortunately, Lott's successful resurrection is underway. Nevertheless, this entire incident will hang over his head of the rest of his career in politics. This is how the P.C. Crowd treats their enemies.

            Now remember the way Bill Clinton worked his P.C. magic during the Monica Lewinsky Incident. Somehow, even though he was guilty of perjury and adultery, Clinton managed to maintain his job through his impeachment. With the help of the media and other liberal P.C. groups Clinton managed to save face in a similar situation that Spitzer is in. There is definitely an art to "wagging the dog" in these instances and the P.C. Crowd has mastered it.

Spitzer will come out of this incident relatively unscathed. First off, the spin is already underway. The apology news conference that got him out in front of the news was the best combination of sincerity and theater. With his wife by his side he admitted he did not live up to his personal expectations. He said he “let himself down.” Finally, he threw himself on the mercy of the media. The next step will save his withered political career.

Next, Spitzer will allow talk of his resignation to circulate while it looks like he is pondering his options. However, his resignation will depend entirely on whether the charges will be dropped is he agrees to leave office. If a deal is made, Spitzer will leave office and begin his lucrative speaking tour, get a book deal, and be a media darling while the P.C. Crowd "marvels" at his bravery, repentance, and rebirth as a man who is sorry for what he has done. If no deal is made then don't be surprised if Spitzer clings to power like Leonardo DiCaprio to a scrap of wood in Titanic. Like Bill Clinton, Spitzer will use every available resource he has to maintain his power and office. Additionally, he will leverage any power he maintains to keep himself out of jail.

Spitzer will make out just fine. Mark my words. Why? Simply put; because he is a liberal. Plain and simple! Now contrast the Spitzer experience and the entire Bill Clinton/Monica scandal with the treatment of Republicans in similar situations and try to draw a conclusion other than the one that a double standard exists.

            No one can deny the fact that there is a major lack of help for the conservative cause. Had Spitzer been a Republican he would have been run out of Albany on a rail. As it stands he is now being rallied around and saved. There will be no relief in sight for this problem if conservatives don’t start using some of the tactics that the P.C. Crowd employs. We need to show the average American the raw stupidity of the liberals’ arguments; especially in situations like this. Without this effort the conservative movement will be doomed as the evil empire.

            We must fight and win this P.C. War. We must stand up for what we know is right. Finally, we must win the fight for the truth.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hillary, Keep Going! Never Give Up!

 

            What an exciting primary season! I am so pleased to see the Democrats fighting tooth and nail to get the right to face John McCain in the general election. Hopefully some of the good old Democrat attacks will come out and both candidates will do McCain’s dirty work. Maybe we’ll even see a “June Surprise” or two just before the convention. It’s hard to guess the repercussions of the Hillary-Barack fight but one thing is for sure, Republicans are enjoying the show!           

            In actuality the real advice for Hillary Clinton is to bow out gracefully and salvage what is left of your pride. Go back to New York and have a nice long Senate career. Be the envy of your party and allow Barack Obama to unite the Democrats heading into what will be a close general election. Show the class that is so often missing in politics. You will be a legend in your own time and will build a legacy that will be looked upon, for years to come, as the politician that is above all of the usual pomp and circumstance.

            Let’s think about the advantage that Obama would have if Hillary were to get out. With the campaign financing problems that John McCain is having (how ironic) Barack can outspend him right up until the convention. This is a chance for Obama to get out ahead of McCain and build his coalition for November.

            Barack could have the best opportunity to win that any Democrat has had since Bill Clinton ran in 1996. However, standing in his way is the Energizer Bunny of the Democrat Primary. She will keep going and going until she effectively sullies her party’s chances at victory. Democrats should be ashamed of her behavior and the effect she is having on the Presidential Race.

Someone should really have a heart to heart talk with Hillary and explain a few things. First the delegate math just doesn’t add up in her favor. Even with the Florida and Michigan delegations seated she would still going to loose. Second, she is keeping the party from uniting behind one candidate. Finally, she is making herself look too ambitious.

Maybe this responsibility should fall to Howard Dean. After all, he is the party chairman. Isn’t it his responsibility to do what is best for the party? Maybe John Kerry should step up and contact Hillary. He did come within an eyelash of being president last election cycle. He is a leader in the Democrat Party Option three is Al Gore. A Nobel Prize goes a long way to establishing credibility and an Oscar doesn’t hurt either.

In all likelihood, none of these people have the gall to take such a bold step. The fear of the Clinton Machine is just too great.

This is good advice, real good advice. But since we know that the Democrats don't listen to the advice that we Republicans give it is rather safe to get excited about the prospect of a brokered convention. Nothing would make me happier than the idea of Hillary's blind ambition dividing the Democrat Party. The idea of "a Great Schism" at the Democrat National Convention makes even the most sympathetic Republicans smile. 

            So with this being said, allow me to join the chorus of Clinton supporters and encourage Hillary to stay in the game. I certainly am enjoying the show and don’t want it to end any time soon.

            Here is an open letter to Senator Clinton.

Dear Hillary,

            It's not over! You can still have a good run of luck. Just think, Florida and Michigan's delegates may get seated! You still hold a sizable lead in Pennsylvania! And never discount your husband's influence over the superdelegates. If all of this comes to fruition your dream of becoming the first woman President will be furthered.

            Please don't worry about your personal image or that of your party. You are the most deserving candidate on the Democrat ballot. After all, you have at least finished one term in the United States Senate. And don't forget that you have been fighting for the people for over 35 years. You are definitely more than just a speech in 2004. Remember, you are the candidate of inevitability!

            If worst comes to worst and you get to the convention with a hundred delegate deficit to overcome you can always try to recruit some more of Obama's pledged delegates. It doesn't matter what the voters decide. You deserve your shot.

            Finally, Mrs. Clinton, please never forget that you have come too far to let a political rookie like Barack Obama spoil your presidency. You certainly have all of the support of the Republican voters in every open primary coming up. We hope our efforts can aide you in your quest. Please let us know if there is anything else we can do to help.
 

   Keep up the good work.

   Very Respectfully Yours,

   Brian Iannucci

 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Change" You Can Deceive With

 

   The fascinating part of the entire Democratic Campaign for President is the universal slogan; "CHANGE." Never have I seen one word define a campaign yet be as ambiguous as this. As it stands, the Democratic candidates have decided to hide behind the slogan of change and not give us any specifics as to their plans.

   Hillary Clinton has talked about her so-called experience and touted her role in her husband's administration. However, the limits of her experience seem to be guiding tours of the White House for distinguished guests and trying to keep the leash on her husband long enough to keep him from being thrown out of office. Senator Clinton's ambition has led her to weave a web of deceit that falsifies her "experience." This deceit will be found out if her White House records were ever to be released by the Clinton Presidential Library. This is exactly why these records will be harder to get than the Rose Law Firm billing records. The fact of the matter is that if her White House experience was worth noting then the Clintons would have documented proof for everyone to see. Their lack of documentation speaks volumes about Hillary's experience. Remember, the goal of the campaign is to highlight the positive and suppress the negative.

   Never underestimate the power of a politician with blind ambition. Hillary's quest began in college with a pact she and Bill made and will not end until she sits behind the same desk in the Oval Office that her loving husband entertained Monica Lewinsky. The idea of "change" for Hillary involves her expansion of power. Going from one of one hundred Senators to the head honcho is the ultimate goal for Senator Clinton. Her blind ambition has brought her to promise the world to the voters. Unfortunately, Clinton slipped up and to the truth when she said, "I have a million ideas. The country can't afford them all."

   Barack Obama, the rock star candidate, has about as much depth as a puddle after a light rain. His popularity, good looks, and brilliant oratory skills have made him the media darling of the race. But even his closest advisors can't tell you his stance on many of the major issues that are plaguing this nation. Obama uses the term "change" as a cover for the lack of substance and experience that he knows he cannot overcome. Senator Obama's fame may win him a popularity contest but voters must be careful what they wish for. The many gaffs that Obama has made, such as wanting to bomb one of our allies, Pakistan, have shown his ineptitude and inexperience. Usually, a President should have at least a full term under his or her belt. Mr. Obama, please stick to writing books and making convention speeches, you will be able to stay afloat with these endeavors.

   Both Clinton and Obama need to define the change they wish to bring about. By deceiving the voters of this nation they are setting themselves up for failure. Further, these actions will create more distrust of the government in this country.

   It has been said many times that, "The truth will set you free." With this being the case I submit to you that both Obama and Clinton are captive to their own web of deceit. Facts, not rhetoric, solve problems. It is a pity that the voters seek the quick fix, follow the crowd, and elect candidates that lack in substance but are long on talk.

   Polished speeches and witty banter can only survive until the day the results of the election are announced. Do we really want either of these candidates answering the phone in the White House at 3 am?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

New Book Released-The P.C. Fraud: Political Correctness in American Politics

 

Press Release

### For Immediate Release###

March 10, 2008

                                                                                                Contact:       Brian A. Iannucci                           brian@brianiannucci.com

The P.C. Fraud: Political Correctness in American Politics by Brian A. Iannucci

Jacksonville, FL -- PublishAmerica is proud to present conservative author Brian A. Iannucci and his latest book, The P.C. Fraud: Political Correctness in American Politics (196 pp, 6 x9 tpb, $19.95)

Political correctness is a major part of the political environment in the United States. When political correctness goes off the deep end you will find a member of the “P.C. Crowd.” P.C.ers, as they are known, are ruining American politics with their focus on emotion and lack of facts. Here is the truth behind the P.C. agenda. This book looks at the goals and focus of the P.C. Crowd. Through examples of their extreme abuses of power it becomes evident that the P.C. Crowd must be defeated. Now there is a plan to take our nation back! With these simple steps that anyone can do, we are able to identify P.C.ers, cure them through a unique recovery process, and join together to beat back the boundaries of political correctness. This nation is too important to leave to the P.C. Crowd! It’s time to let the pros take over!

Brian A. Iannucci is an entrepreneur from Jacksonville, Florida. With a B.A. in political science from the University of Florida and a M.B.A. from Liberty University, he attacks the political problems of the day with a common-sense approach. Brian brings a business-like approach to politics that is a refreshing change from the status quo.

-30-

 

 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »